Using Technology to Deepen Democracy, Using Democracy to Ensure Technology Benefits Us All

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

If We All Know the War Was Wrong Then Why Are We Acting This Way?

Upgraded and adapted from the Moot. "JM" raises an interesting point about my support of shoe hurling Iraqi journalist Muntadar al-Zaidi:
I'm not so sure about this. Isn't it kind of important to make sure people aren't getting up and throwing things at public speakers? What if it had been a grenade?

What exactly are the charges? Is he actually in trouble for saying in Iraq what we all know in North America, or is it more of a "don't look like you're attempting to assassinate a world leader" thing?

"What if it had been a grenade?"

You mean like the shocking awesome tons of munitions we actually did drop killing thousands upon thousands of innocent Iraqis in an immoral illegal catastrophic war of choice relentlessly cheered on by the very man at whom the shoe was tossed?

Let me tell you, were nonlethal creampies and smelly shoes to be hurled at this lying ignorant self-satisfied warcriminal every day for the rest of his miserable life it would be quite fine and dandy with me. I would personally prefer that criminal charges and damning historical judgments be hurled instead, and that is my own preferred mode of recrimination, being as you know an effete elite aesthete and all, but I cannot say that I won't have a sunny smile for more palpable expressions of dissatisfaction that find their way to YouTube in years to come.

Yes, we can and already do all agree that assassination is wrong and I refuse to take seriously the suggestion that anything about my position of support for the journalist would be construed as suggesting otherwise to anybody without a highly questionable ideological axe to grind. But if what is wanted here is to stand on principle, I do think the thing for the Principled to be making sure of in this case is not that this man feel properly chastened for tossing a shoe but that this man is not being tortured or killed or shunted off into some deep hole for having the temerity to register in a public way "what we all know in North America" already.

This last felicitous phrase of yours, by the way, makes a claim I do not know that I agree with you about, because like any good pragmatist I cannot feel right about claiming that one can properly be said to "know" a thing at all until one's conduct reflects that knowing in a meaningful way. Now, that's something I scarcely see evidence of, really, given the amount of money, death-dealing, and rationalization still flushing our appalling war machineries as though everybody in North America actually "knows" something altogether different from what they claim to know... namely, that the war and occupation is and always has been illegal, immoral, devastating to all but a few war-profiteers, based on lies, and productive of mostly the opposite effects to the ones on the basis of which it was and is promoted by moneyed elites. If everybody really knows this, then why on earth are we acting the way we do?

That we elected Obama to end the war is encouraging, certainly, but the question whether we will actually truly leave any time soon, whether we will let the killer clowns of the Bush Administration get away with their self-congratulatory fabulizing, whether we will punish them for their monumental crimes or claim that all that is now "in the past" (something almost any criminal could say, by the way, without any expectation that this is somehow exculpatory), whether we will take back the ill-gotten gains of war-profiteers who benefited from this abomination, whether we will ever provide reparations for the damage we have done (the latest round of accusations that the Iraqis are "ingrates" is not particularly encouraging on this score, nor, frankly, the ambivalences being exhibited about support for Muntadar al-Zaidi, in my humble opinion), whether we will learn from our mistakes in a way reflected in our laws, our budgetary priorities, our expressed attitudes toward peacemakers as against warriors and so on all remains to be seen, and until I do see differences that make a difference I hesitate to grant that America knows what it says it now knows about this shattering brutal criminal episode in our history.

1 comment:

jimf said...

> You mean like the shocking awesome tons of munitions
> we actually did drop killing thousands upon thousands
> of innocent Iraqis. . .

Yes, but they were nobodies. Unknown. Nameless.
Only a statistic. "Thousands upon thousands" --
plus or minus, what?

"Statistics:
Length of war: forty-eight years, one month.
Total casualties, including machines (reckoned on
logarithmic sentience scale), medjel and non-combatants:
851.4 billion (+- .3%).
Losses: ships (all classes above interplanetary) -
91,215,660 (+- 200);
Orbitals - 14,334;
planets and major moons - 53;
Rings - 1;
Spheres - 3;
stars (undergoing significant induced mass-loss
or sequence-position alteration) - 6.

Historical perspective: A small, short war that
rarely extended throughout more than .02% of the
galaxy by volume and .01% by stellar population.
Rumours persist of far more impressive conflicts,
stretching through vastly greater amounts of time
and space. . . . Nevertheless, the chronicles of
the galaxy's elder civilisations rate the Idiran-Culture
war as the most significant conflict of the past
fifty thousand years, and one of those singularly
interesting Events they see so rarely these days."

Iain M. Banks, _Consider Phlebas_

> Let me tell you, were nonlethal creampies and
> smelly shoes to be hurled at this lying ignorant
> self-satisfied warcriminal every day for the
> rest of his miserable life it would be quite
> fine and dandy with me.

Ah, but the **symbolic** damage done by a creampie
in the face of a Great One is much more significant
than the death of an unknown nobody.

Haven't you ever heard of _lèse majesté_?

And don't forget Ayn Rand's suspicion of humor in general --
that it demonstrates that one "is not serious about
own values". But hurling filth at heroes -- well, that's
just the last resort of the morally corrupt, an outward
mark of a malign sense of life, the acting-out of the
envy of the mediocre toward the manifest superiority
of their betters.

Or, as the Scientologists put it, the act of a
Suppressive Person. Tom Cruise was righteously
(and rightfully) indignant, don't you remember, at getting
squirted in the face by a fake microphone while
being interviewed at the premiere of _War of the Worlds_.
As well he should have been! His wealth and fame
are mere hints of his glory as a billion-year-old
Shaker and Mover in this universe! (And the prankster
got arrested, too.)
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/cruiseap062005.html