It's based on bullshit mythology of the Internet. That it used to be pure, but got corrupted. @tante
— Yasha Levine (@yashalevine) September 6, 2016
@yashalevine @tante The end-to-end principle is *always* figured via the already reactionary conception of negative liberty. Hijinks ensue.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) September 6, 2016
@dalecarrico @yashalevine if all you can think of is the individual, you'll miss everything about social and society.
— Jürgen Geuter (@tante) September 6, 2016
@tante @yashalevine Indeed; more particularly, all liberty is substantiated in/by public investment/performance and hence is "positive"... 1
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) September 6, 2016
@tante @yashalevine Presumably "negative" liberties are efforts to naturalize, de-politicize status-quo conventions benefiting incumbency. 2
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) September 6, 2016
@tante @yashalevine The empty-space of e2e mimes Millian space the fist can swing except where it meets my chin: the "pre-political" body. 3
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) September 6, 2016
@tante @yashalevine No surprise this actually politicized body reappears in paranoid cyber-talk of crypto-security, individuted-privacy... 4
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) September 6, 2016
@tante @yashalevine "individuated" (sorry). MacPherson's "Possessive Individualism" again, which Hayles mapped onto the cyberspatial sprawl.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) September 6, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment